On 9 April 2013 at 17:22, Julian Gilbey wrote:
| On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:58:39PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
| > This can be done with the attached patch, that I tested locally.
| 
| One tiny fix to the patch is needed (presumably a typo):
| 
| > -rversion   := $(shell dpkg-query -W -f='$${Version}' r-base-dev)
| > +rAPIversion        := $(shell dpkg-query -W -f='$${Provides}' r-base-core 
| grep -o 'r-api.[^,]')
| 
| This grep command should be grep -o 'r-api[^,]*' (with a '*' and
| perhaps no '.') so that r-api-3a will be returned as r-api-3a and not
| r-api-3 as needed.
| 
| Other than that, I fully support the need for this patch, for the
| reasons given in the bug report.
| 
| On the related subject of debian-r.debian.net (which I had been
| unaware of), it is not clear from the packages which version of R they

As with previous 'cran2deb' efforts: always the most current one in the
distro flavour.  So testing for testing (when Charles and I did cran2deb).

| are built against, and therefore whether they will work on R 2.14 or
| on R 3.0; this would solve that problem entirely (assuming that the
| packages are then built using the appropriate r-api-* dependency).

It really isn't needed as debian-r.debian.net / cran2deb is a huge big fat
binNMU generator (and more, package creator).

| On a side note, I wonder whether it's worth me having my tiny handful
| of r-cran-* packages in Debian at all; as they are more likely to be

It depends on maintainer committement.  My 100+ r-cran-* are generally
current, sadly I don't always feel the same about debian-{med,science}.

| updated regularly (and, presumably, automatically) on that site, that
| would be much more useful to people in the long run.  So perhaps I
| should just ask for my packages to be removed from testing?  Comments
| would be appreciated!

That is a discussion we should have about the possible "moonshoot" of having
the 4400+ CRAN package (or a "reasonable" [ for different definitions of
"reasonable" ]) subset in Debian.

Dirk

-- 
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to