Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > [...] >> 3. Some possible splitting schemes >> =============================== > [...] >> 3.2 tetex-base >> >> For tetex-base, the additional splitting-off of a type1-fonts-x11 >> package can be added to both following splitting schemes: > > Do we talk about TrueType or PS Type1 fonts here?
teTeX does not contain any TrueType fonts (and using them still requires some manual work). > The next interesting question here is: How much of the > fonts is needed by the typical debian-build? Will it need > all the .mf sources? Will it be happy with T1 fonts? > Is it worthwhile to split off all the unneeded fonts into > tetex-fonts? Without checking, I'd say a typical Debian build today uses mf versions of the CM fonts, Bluesky fonts (CM in Type1 format and OT1 encoding) and/or the PSNFSS fonts (basic PS fonts) in Type1 format, maybe plus some small symbol fonts. EC fonts should be included, too, for translations to western european languages. All the antt, antp, gothic, concrete, cmbright, xypic, lucida, etc.pp. are not needed. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
