On 29.03.2013 20:40, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 29/03/13 20:37, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 18:38:26 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Axel, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, I didn't realise that
a positive confirmation was always needed to upload to unstable.
Due to the holiday weekend, I won't be spending a lot of time at
my desk and did the upload proactively so that the issue can be
fixed and not hold up the release.
Don't worry, there's 0 chance of resiprocate holding up the
release.
[...]
There are obviously many people out their in IT who keep their
knowledge, bug fixes, etc to themselves and see it as a way of making
a living. I've always had the impression that Debian strives to be
the opposite of that, bringing people solutions openly, and that is
all I've tried to do here when I discovered a problem today (on a
public holiday too incidentally) and provided a detailed analysis,
identification of the root cause and comments on how other packages
may be impacted.
Interesting an insight as that was, I'm not entirely sure what it had
to do with Julien's mail.
Regards,
Adam
(also somewhere it's a public holiday and on the end of a somewhat
flaky 3G connection but not convinced either of them are relevant to the
fact that I'm doing stuff)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org