Apparently I accidentally sent this off-list first... oops :-) ----- Forwarded message from Wouter Verhelst <w...@uter.be> -----
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:56:46 +0100 From: Wouter Verhelst <w...@uter.be> To: Gerfried Fuchs <rho...@deb.at> Subject: Re: Bug#703633: debchange --bpo writes bpo60 in debian/changelog as version in wheezy Message-ID: <514cd39e.3070...@uter.be> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 In-Reply-To: <20130321164323.ga22...@anguilla.debian.or.at> On 21-03-13 17:43, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Also, I'm not 100% convinced that wheezy should ship with dch doing > backports to wheezy. This somehow doesn't make that much sense to me. It does make it harder to have "automatic" backports (where that makes sense) by doing a "dget foo.dsc; <unpack, cd into source>; dch --bpo 'recompile for stable'; debuild". In that light, it makes a lot more sense to me than to have the dch in stable (with --bpo) default to building for oldstable... -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
