On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:57:02PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:46:07AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > libsocialweb package in testing has a security bug as CVE-2012-4511, > > and I've cherry-picked a patch from upstream as just 1 liner one. > > > > Please consider to unblock libsocialweb. > > The diff from testing to sid is not just your security fix: > > | Base version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-2 from testing > | Target version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-3.1 from unstable > > If you want an isolated fix for the security issue it will have to go > through t-p-u. I only glanced at the diff for sid, but it looks unsuitable > at this stage (adding vala bindings, for example).
Ping? -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 <directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
