On 03/22/2013 01:51 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm not particularly happy with binaries with pretty generic names
> ("addbuiltin" is a good example of such) ending up in /usr/bin...
> But you can try to convince me otherwise. Or move them in some other
> directory.
hm, i think the following new binaries should be unobjectionable in
/usr/bin :
p7content
p7env
p7sign
p7verify
symkeyutil
ocspclnt
chktest
derdump
rsaperf
vfychain
vfyserv
These two TLS client utilities and two TLS server utilities have
somewhat generic names, but i think are useful enough to ship in
/usr/bin despite the genericness (they can be used along with gnutls-cli
and gnutls-serv and "openssl s_client" and "openssl s_server" to do
interop testing for new TLS clients and servers, for example):
strsclient
tstclnt
httpserv
selfserv
The following three are the most dubious in terms of names:
addbuiltin
pp
dbtest
i'd be fine shipping the last category and optionally the client/server
utilities with an nss- prefix if you think that would be more
acceptable. I'd rather not move them entirely out of the $PATH if
possible. and i'd prefer to not rename existing tools that we have
already been shipping in libnss3-tools, of course.
Would you like me to prepare an alternate patch that does that renaming
on one or both groups?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
