On 2013-03-20 19:09, Bob Proulx wrote:
Hi Filipus,
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
forwarded 703565 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14012
Does that work?
Yes, see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#forwarded
I thought that needed to be an email address there
not a URL.
It might have been that way, but a really long time ago. Both are
supported currently.
tags 703565 + upstream
thanks
Oops... reporting to 2 ITS-s at the same time is a nice feature, but
I didn't mean to try it with this case.
Anyway, as it's already done, this is also #14012 upstream.
Yes. I probably would have simply reported it directly upstream and
hashed it out there first. Unless you think Debian should deviate
from upstream on this?
I apologize for the noise here. I used reportbug-ng to avoid making an
error in the pseudo-headers formatting, but instead of changing the
recipient for GNU, I added one keeping Debian. So my little trick is
uncovered!
I never intended to report this to Debian, and suggest that discussion
is kept on GNU's ITS, unless the discussion gets Debian-specific.
If the only problem with the addition was the increased size of
coreutils, I think that shouldn't be a reason to prevent the addition
for my PC (modern laptop). But Debian also targets somewhat embedded
devices. And it's far from the only distribution designed for modern
PCs. So I consider this issue as very little Debian-specific.
[...]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
