On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:35:58PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Confirmed.  This looks like a behavior change in libpam0g, as pam_set_data's
> behavior does not match the documentation.  Will dig deeper.

Correction; this is a behavior change in pam_tally, which apparently
underwent a significant rewrite between 0.76 and 0.79.  I've pulled a patch
from upstream CVS that is intended to fix this, and will upload soon.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to