On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 06:05 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 297923 patch
> thanks
>
> In this bug Martin F. Krafft mentions that different versions of
> libpam-smbpass and samba-common on the same system lead to a big mess.
>
> Martin's suggestion in this bug report seems fair to me. I hesitated
> between the following two solutions for libpam-smbpass:
>
> -Add "samba-common (= ${Source-Version})" to Depends
> -Add "samba-common (<<${Source-Version}) to Conflicts
>
> I finally choosed the latter, which seems less invasive to me and
> avoids enforcing users of libpmam-smbpass to install samba-common.You also want to conflict with >> don't you? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
