On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:18:27PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman > Steve> wrote: > >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you > >> turn off krb4? > Steve> According to upstream, krb524 works without krb4 in heimdal > Steve> 0.7; nothing was said about heimdal 0.6.3 which we > Steve> currently have in unstable, but I imagine we'd need to move > Steve> to the new version. > It looks like totally removing krb4 support would mean conflicting > with kerberos4kth, due to conflicts between shared libraries used. > Does this matter? > Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive > anyway? Do heimdal's krb4 support libraries actually implement the same ABI as the kerberos4kth implementation? Depending on the details, it might be better to Provides/Conflicts/Replaces the old krb4 lib package; but if the ABIs aren't the same, it would be better to fix the heimdal version so that it doesn't collide. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
