On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:46 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Should we rather drop davical from Wheezy, then? I personally would say this is not necessary...
First let me repeat... I've only reported these things in the Debian BTS, as the "upstream" BTS is not working.... and as I knew that upstraem=deb-maint Secondly, while I've found several places one should definitely schedule to work on, there is no real exploit known yet. > We generally try to avoid shipping packages, where upstream is unavailable > or inactive. Well but there we have surely more packages which have a really dead upstream... and not just one who is right now busy. Cheers, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature