On 18.03.2013 13:55, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2013-03-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up?
It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine
here.
Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new upload as 5.11 would have been
rejected.
Such an upload could have been done in testing-proposed-updates.
That really wouldn't have helped.
The problem is that builds of packages on s390x are (well, were) broken
_in unstable_ by the version of libmagic _in unstable_. Any breakage in
testing is purely a side-effect of broken packages built in unstable
migrating.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
