-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-03-14 14:25, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > It may be possible I am only one who encounter this problem, > because of very unusual configuration: > > leftsubnet = 192.168.0.0/24 rightsubnet = 0.0.0.0/0
Could you please send the whole relevant config, because I have not encountered the problem so far. > With this configuration I had a problem in version 4.5 also, but I > have solved it by deleting second default route from table 220. > May be it is bad solution, but it works. Meanwhile with 4.6 > version I've got very different, strange and fatal problem. With > this configuration the machine where this strongswan is running > announces all address of local network 192.168.0.0/24 as it's own, > so all IP address becomes binded with the same MAC address and > network stops working: nobody can connect each other. I'm not sure I fully understand the binding you mention: does the gateway answer all ARP requests when the tunnel is up? Rene -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRRvFgAAoJEDzCOI+szQadDAEP/3QpMHEuCRl8S4WnWkTUGW7H nWGlPpAvUm6EfADHGrxMhnPmMmP5CRPYZOqMAWzPpN1pClKNDkYLNgE6KRkqm0yt wbaJtPQrhHnUfIp4hGOpq7Pq0IITrIJ0qyusAi30hibZ+WO6IC/9L+5zwxVKzMQs 1++EuwHxy3sPDcAnY7E9PYGZjJqXBlP34+8sej7ArNvWlLry6mMMrgjMn7jGlTOx QR8eGX/egCFFwlrx2CJslxcDooNq1lsGx4W+EjLzLm7Sb+nm35DLZ7T5A8xViK/j CwbNDWajk4DPXKLyVdvX7qNEu1pGXIa0mwuOauWUbZHuAqoKav9iPuEmtdLg4+z7 yLZAgDgMvxoD35Em1HI6PUjS4POCFcTf9MJ0LE8wUSrofjU0Lrw//lwOfDQTpBxy BL0TDsdzJxX7/k+g8QhBozEpUYwgpD9MMJjSZgFkVPOjfIKusoWOsMxRLhbOVgIt umadBRRX1021Hfo6+ZWNSiJqXtLHtXkLK/j5QyjrAFbz0bPHol43CUsRIktVmuho Vcl/iOjX5A1eo/oLmqFSJJGceTh700Xae7V6Cp/23Rav1Q4FctoYLg5J2MOSu4eJ CFPo0taG5MFzNBsJhDNm4VHPKb0ZD8uN9sVzp2i/HWxxJKMbgDIxt2lcZkJVNiRf CsHXxd+/ZFycHtcDMtmK =cTIF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
