Hi Antoine Dropping Tobias Oetiker again from Cc, don't know if he is actually interested to follow this. But we might/should bring further issues with smokeping to him.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:42:39PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Control: found -1 2.6.7-1 > Control: fixed -1 2.6.9-1~exp0 > Control: fixed -1 2.3.6-5+squeeze1 > Control: tags -1 pending > Control: block -1 with 703193 > > On 2013-03-16, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Control: fixed -1 2.6.7-1 > > > > Hi Steven > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:40:04PM +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >> Control: reopen -1 > > > > Hmm, as Adam wrote, was this intentional? Because this way we lost the > > version tracking for already fixed version. BTS handles fixed versions > > already. > > From what I understand from the upstream changelog, 2.6.7 would still be > affected, because the patch we had before was incomplete. So I think > that "reopen" was actually accurate. Indeed, Steven is right. 2.6.7-1 has not the full charatecter set as supplied later with the 2.6.9 release upstream, so this needs to be also updated and pushed for wheezy. So again, thanks Steven for pringing this up. > I have done an upload of 2.6.9 to factor those changes in, which I hope > to pass by the RM so that 2.6.9-1 gets into wheezy. 2.6.9 unfortunately > has unrelated changes, so I have uploaded it to experimental, but those > changes seem important enough, to me, to go into wheezy. > > Before going forward with the sid upload, I'll wait for RM's approval > though. See #703193 for followup on that. Hmm, this will quite sure not be approved. And Jonathan Wiltshire already commented there. A new upstream version at this stage of the freeze is not acceptable. But how about the attached patch for unstable? Thank you for your work, and regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
