On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:21:07 -0700, tony mancill wrote:

> > (What's missing is some explanation in d/copyright how and why the
> > +ds version is created, I suppose. Oh, and a note in d/changelog that
> > debian/patches/02_update_buildtime.patch was refreshed.)
> 
> Thank you very much for the analysis, walk-thru, and patch.

You're welcome!
 
> One question - why do you think an update to d/copyright is required?
> The fixed tarball addresses the ./debian/ being inadvertently included
> in the tarball and restores the upstream files that had been deleted, so
> I'm not clear on how the copyright really changes.  It seems mostly that
> I need to add an extended mea culpa to the d/changelog.

Right, I guess I was a bit confused :)

My line of thought was: d/copyright requires to include the origin of
the upstream source, which means that for repacked tarballs a note
about what/why/how was changed should be included. [0]- But in this
case -- as you say -- it's only a one-time fix, and in order to bring
back the pristine tarball.
 
> I'm also wondering if I can get away with addressing the open bug about
> a bashism in the package (very simple patch), since I believe that was a
> release goal (for lenny?).

Looking at the freeze policy [1], this should be covered by
"3. fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority:
optional or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;"


Cheers,
gregor

[0]
I don't find this part in policy right now, just in the
Copyright-Format 1.0 spec:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#comment-field
[1]
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html


-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   BOFH excuse #138:  BNC (brain not connected) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to