Which part of "I realize this is a convenience meta-package but even such packages should not force deprecated broken stuff on users, otherwise it is not really so much convenient any more." has been missed here? And what exactly changed here since the reply on 19 Feb 2012? Because the reasoning for WONTFIX makes absolutely no sense. The package introduces dependencies on highly broken system stuff such as hal. One would think reasonable distributions would even have policies against such packages. And then you say you want to "provide applications to users which might not already know them." - you want to provide users with broken things depending on even more broken things as a "convenience"? Huh.
> -- > 660453: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660453 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > > > ---------- Přeposlaná zpráva ---------- > From: Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org> > The metapackage is here to provide applications to users which might not > already know them. It's merely an indication of the whole Xfce desktop > environment. Nobody forces you to use it. Although they might be buggy, > they're still useful, so I don't see a need to remove it from the > metapackage. After all, nobody forces you to use it. And if you don't > even want it on your system, remove xfce4-goodies metapackage, it > doesn't provide anything else than dependencies anyway. > > Regards, > -- > Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
