On 03/06/2013 09:51 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: >>> 3) fsck.btrfs does not support the standard fsck options >> >> easy fixable, but hasn't much to do with the current remaining problem >> in sid. > > Yes, it does.
no, it does not. even if fsck.btrfs ignores all required options, it still fails because of sysvinits /run/rootdev. >>> 4) fsck.btrfs error codes >>> >>> I haven't tested this due to point (2) above >> >> me neither, but that's easy fixable too and hasn't much to do with the >> current remaining problem in sid. > > Yes, it does. no, it does not. even if fsck.btrfs returns equal values, it still fails because of sysvinits /run/rootdev. > You broke booting with the default init system for all people using a > btrfs rootfs. if people are using unstable, yes. keep in mind that eventhough it is not desirable nor intended, bugs do happen. also in unstable. unrelated to that, i would appreciate if you could calm down your tone a bit, it is more productive that way, thank you. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
