On 2013-02-19 20:21, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> [...] > > Hi, >
Hi, > I finally had some time to work on a new package, with both removing the > extjs library, and fixing the symlink to the library. > > Since the source is repackaged, I named the new package > glpi 0.83.31+dfsg-1 > Great. > The problem is, the diff is huge (3.5M) due to the removal of the extjs > library, so I cannot attach it to this mail. I have attached to this > mail a diffstat of the debdiff, and an extract to show all changes not > being removals. Can you check the diff and confirm me if this is ok for > you ? If you need to complete diff I can of course upload it to a > server. > The changes looks fine. > If this is fine, what is the next step ? Should I open a new bug for the > release team ? Should I also upload the repackaged source in unstable > before (or at the same time) ? > > Thanks, > Pierre > #694642 got downgraded since last time I looged. I have to admit that I am considering to just "ignore" the embedded swf issue Wheezy[1] and call this a day. I know it is not as satisfying for you (or me for that matter), but I think it is the pragmatic thing to do here. That said, you can just upload that version to sid; if we change our minds the fixed version will have had a bit more time in sid. And if not, then the bug is at least fixed in the start of Jessie. ~Niels [1] We already got a few "DFSG-incompatible JSON" issues that won't be fixed in Wheezy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
