On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:00:04PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. So I wrote something what looks more > reasonable than original Geller's patch to me. Am I really only one who cares > that apt is corrupting package it downloads ? This time > tetex-base_3.0.orig.tar.gz > is corrupted on redownload as its last byte is CR (0D) (it is replaced with > 'H', > see previous messages in this bugreport and bug 290694).
I applied your patch to the apt I uploaded to experimental. I'm not entirely sure about possible side-effect in the patch so I would like to see it tested in experimental first. > Can sombody at least tell me why this important data corrupting bug is > ignored for more than year? Probably because this is a very central piece of the code and any mistake here is fatal. Anyway, it's in experimental now and let's hope we find enough people to test it :) Cheers, Michael -- Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
