On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 07:47 +0100, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> Am 26.02.2013 um 19:19 schrieb Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk>:
>
> > So, was the hypervisor upgrade also accompanied by a kernel update, in
> > either the dom0 or guest domains? If so what versions were involved and
> > where?
>
>
> Additionally to the last mail:
> After running two days stable with the downgraded packages, I've now
> upgraded the hypervisor package to
> xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64_4.0.1-5.6_amd64.deb again and rebooted.
> If the machine runs stable with that, I'd say the kernel package is
> broken. And if the issues popping up again now, it's the hypervisor.
I am 99% positive it will turn out to be the kernel, but please do let
us know.
> All domUs are still running the updated kernel packages (pre
> DSA-2632-1), the dom0 the downgraded kernel package.
When you reach a conclusion (assuming it is the one I expect!) please
can you confirm the fixed+broken kernel package versions so I can
reassign as appropriate.
Unfortunately I'm about to go travelling for a week but I have asked one
of my colleagues to try and take a look at this.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that balances are
correct.
-- Princess Irulan, "Manual of Maud'Dib"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
