On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:09:21AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 31.08.2012 20:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >I discussed this briefly with Neil at DebConf, and he seemed to
> >think it
> >would be ok; if you disagree, it's his fault. ;)
> >
> >The version of upstart currently in testing is ancient.  Getting
> >it updated
> >has been blocked on prerequisite changes in other packages of
> >which I am not
> >the maintainer (e.g. plymouth), so while I was fully intending to
> >have this
> >in before freeze, that clearly didn't happen.  Sorry about that.

> >The pieces have now come together to the point that it seems worth
> >filing an
> >unblock request with the details.

> AFAICT, all of the pieces involved here have now migrated, so I'm
> closing this request. Steve - I did notice there's a new version of
> mountall in sid (2.47 vs 2.46) but wasn't sure what the plan was
> there; in any case, it seems the required changes to support the
> newer upstart have migrated.

Yep, thanks - mountall 2.47 would be better than 2.46 but the changes are
probably nothing critical, so I wasn't planning to request an unblock with
any sort of priority.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to