On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:09:21AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 31.08.2012 20:02, Steve Langasek wrote: > >I discussed this briefly with Neil at DebConf, and he seemed to > >think it > >would be ok; if you disagree, it's his fault. ;) > > > >The version of upstart currently in testing is ancient. Getting > >it updated > >has been blocked on prerequisite changes in other packages of > >which I am not > >the maintainer (e.g. plymouth), so while I was fully intending to > >have this > >in before freeze, that clearly didn't happen. Sorry about that.
> >The pieces have now come together to the point that it seems worth > >filing an > >unblock request with the details. > AFAICT, all of the pieces involved here have now migrated, so I'm > closing this request. Steve - I did notice there's a new version of > mountall in sid (2.47 vs 2.46) but wasn't sure what the plan was > there; in any case, it seems the required changes to support the > newer upstart have migrated. Yep, thanks - mountall 2.47 would be better than 2.46 but the changes are probably nothing critical, so I wasn't planning to request an unblock with any sort of priority. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature