Hi On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 06:09:45PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:33:58PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:59 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > Assuming there will be also either a DSA or a pu for pyrad, how should > > > > that be versioned? Traditionally for Squeeze it was +squeeze1, but: > > [...] > > > Once 1.2-1+deb7u1 reaches wheezy (next 24 hours) we will be able to use > > > 1.2-1+deb6u1 for any hypothetical DSA to slot in between squeeze and > > > wheezy. > > > > Well, there's a 1.2.1+deb6u1 in p-u-NEW. I can't find a p-u request for > > it though... > > > This is the first I know of it.
Might be that my reply in #700669 (message #83[1]), made the confusion. I mentioned there that #700669 was marked as no-dsa and needs to go trough a p-u. @Jeremy: to clarify: I'm not part of the Release Team, so the p-u should have a official request to the release team (peferably as bugreport via release.debian.org pseudo-package) [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700669#83 @Adam and Jonathan: will make it clearer in future replies that this needs an approval first from Release Team when I say "was classified no-dsa, could you please prepare targeting stable and to go trough a stable-proposed-updates" (in case this was part of the problem). Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
