On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org> wrote: > > [Daniel Schepler] >> debian/ino_t_test >> *** >> *** 'apr_ino_t' size is 8, expected 4 >> *** Please report this to the Debian Apache maintainers >> *** > > This test exists in order to detect an ABI change from older 1.2 > (before lenny!) to present. Obviously the x32 port didn't exist then, > so, is there any installed base of x32 binaries outside Debian, built > in an environment from 2007, that dynamically link to libapr1 and would > break if run on Debian? Seems unlikely. > > Perhaps we can drop ino_t_test entirely? It seems like at this late > date, any problem it still finds will be a false positive.
That makes sense, and in fact I thought something like that might be the case when I was looking at it. But I chose to implement the least invasive change, and I'll leave it up to your judgment as to whether or not you want to remove it. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
