-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi!
I rechecked that. gpg-agent is not required. However, we might still want to add a Recommends on gpg-agent. What do you think? WM Am 2013-02-22 20:14, schrieb Willi Mann: > Hi Daniel! > > What do you think about this bug? As far as I understand it, > gpg-agent is required for enigmail since some 1.* version of > enigmail. So it seems right to add a Depends on gpg-agent, which > already depends on pinentry. > > Shall we try to get a fix into wheezy? > > WM > > Am 2013-02-08 22:22, schrieb Sebastian Niehaus: >> Package: enigmail Version: 2:1.4.1-2 Severity: normal > >> Needed some google to make enigmail running again: pnentry was >> missing on my system. > >> Maybe there enigmail should recommend or depend on pinentry? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRJ9DCAAoJEIy+IZx0V22BfZ8P/2rEYlrBLmnLxRGj8mZHQCrW aqdQfNDFrwkr6gaMxNHY7X1lc3DmTMoN5rbXppuxXi0yx1ZhmVWmYnaHDVfGxnSb G/tHjFPGj38USt5efzxEjZFB0unhGPLATve+YxToK/EDJwEBojAkH8HM0vldd//0 W3I2VdNR7f1rZf8SE8/XOzs8cpOkeXW53Mb02NLT0O2ln62UNo6nvklyRhi9fQg4 4mQtGqki0c75Hk9K5z7p9rOVspUo3G6+qhjnQSmvaYC7QMJBMaEjp38SsBnZ4Chy 94EiJE6n9E0gEcoBRmwXvdNnby7Dzlx8uPWWcCSQf94IE+06cz7f/tqB97umybuh SW/x4R5cQWtQ6kL7vyE8IQdMaj73lCGLRCgRj7RtNy7e0eGfZQ1oqt6t7DA89leP cSrtqO2fLamnR5TadRRXenm1XlcJC/AzDbwf5Po5a6Pc4hw4o3lHqx8iQMtIk+HZ DsUOEkBTcqSzykR0b8d8ZP2+I9zBVFWQM18J989s3wDG7D9TYnpVNfFAzVzc4poD a6nVUVZ4whWKtGbQywu/Oc8l1THRBfF/p2mZem0vWUW1qIitnr8RI/D48apThuRB e5bSxr4kAdFEk+TkpGX7KHHsuJsorDybsiM/5RJRl1nwMpAWrGvxljd5WjJ5ndBW PiH9aD5GLFM9FpJyP2u/ =0YzN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
