Control: found -1 1.99.9-1 Hi all
I had a look at the version in experimental: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:23:20PM +0100, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote: > I don't think we have Corosync 2.0 anywhere (we have 1.99 in experimental, I > don't know if that specific version is affected or not just yet). So can we > please > tag this bug accordingly? The version in experimental has on lines 407 and 408: 407 hash_param.data = 0; 408 hash_param.len = 0; which is in init_nss_hash. So this looks like corosync in experimental is affected. Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
