On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: block -1 by 689508 689202 > > debsums (2.0.49) unstable; urgency=low > * when querying dpkg-divert include the user specified root filesystem > in --admindir (Closes: #632463) > > piatti is running 2.0.48+nmu3
Perhaps this is why I don't have any problems with debsums in my setup. > >> I believe that debsums should not report failures for modified files >> which are owned by multiple packages, or are subject to diversion. > > Why not? > personally, I don't want to see gnome-gmail failed for modifying /usr/sbin/update-icon-caches -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
