On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 15:12 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 2/21/2013 11:37 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Apologies if I'm missing something here, but is that a definition > > of "fixed" that involves intentionally allowing the migration of > > package A to make package B uninstallable in testing? > > Exactly. Because making package B uninstallable is much more > acceptable than making it unrunnable.
No. Both situations are buggy and neither of them is acceptable in testing. [There are situations where we do knowingly introduce uninstallability to testing, but those are always short term and to "unblock" a greater problem such as a large transition. We'd rather never have to do so and it certainly shouldn't be expected to be a standard part of the transition for a particular package.] Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
