Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 19:03:48 GMT) : > now that i have a volunteer other than myself to test it, i will wait > until i hear back from you :)
I've been using the proposed msva-perl's integration into the SSH client for a week and have not experienced any regression. > meanwhile, if anyone on the release team (cc'ed here) wants to give a > review of the proposed debdiff, i would be happy to know if msva-perl > 0.8.1-1 would be acceptable for t-p-u. Most of the cherry-picked changes make sense to me, fix important or RC bugs, and are obviously fine for t-p-u to me. Some of the cherry-picked changes (e.g. the one that fixes #614313) are not explicitly documented in debian/changelog, and don't exactly match the current freeze policy. However, I think these ones are trivial and have already had more than six months of exposure in unstable. So, I recommend the release team pre-approves this t-p-u upload, and perhaps Daniel could go through the msva-perl_debian/0.8-2..wheezy log, and makes sure everything is mentionned in debian/changelog (while documenting every upstream change in there would not be necessary if this was a regular upload to sid, I think a t-p-u upload is a bit different and should document it details every change it brings in). Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
