Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 18:56 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > I would like to upload lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1 to > testing-proposed-updates to fix #694352 in wheezy. At the moment, > 2.92-1+b1 is in testing and 2.92-2 is in unstable. > > The debdiff is attached. > > May I go ahead?
Thanks for working on fixing this in wheezy. It looks like this issue still affects the unstable package; is that correct? If so then it should be resolved there first, before we consider a tpu. A quick query on the proposed diff - why is the same symlink being managed both via debian/links and an "ln -sf" (and later rm) in debian/rules? Hmmm, actually... having compared the file currently shipped in lcdf-typetools with that from the "aglfn" package, the difference appears to be purely the license statement; the actual data is identical. In that case I assume Adobe haven't done anything helpful like retrospectively applied the license change? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
