Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2013-01-28 21:21, bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > From b136d3ecb257b408381e31ac4a2ebbe1ca87ab99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Bastien=20ROUCARI=C3=88S?= <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:59:46 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Detect empty gfdl statement about invariant sections. > > gfdl requests to explicitly mark that you have not invariant section by > writing > text like this: > "with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts." > > Some author instead use empty text. Detect this usage. > --- > [...] > --- a/t/tests/cruft-gfdl-invariants/tags > +++ b/t/tests/cruft-gfdl-invariants/tags > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > +E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants > src/empty.texi > +E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants > src/emptybis.texi ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is not the newly introduced tag and no later patch corrects it. Thus I suspect the code has a bug. > E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants > src/frontback.html > E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants > src/frontback.texi > E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants > src/invariant.txt > -- 1.7.10.4 ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
