Hi Sebastian.

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:13 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> I don't think that there would be any real reason for that.
Yeah well not many at least... maybe one wants to omit the library for
some reason and has the rrdtool binary anyway.

>  So, as long
> as nobody comes up who could imagine any *real* reason for that, I won't
> do that. I just don't think using the rrdtool binary rather than the
> Perl module makes any sense.
Well wouldn't people anyway get librrds-perl if that is put first?


> Yeah, that makes sense. I've added rrdtool to the suggested packages.
Great.


Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to