Steve Langasek wrote: > The installer team are consulted on the > question of which packages should be made available as udebs, but for shared > libraries the maintenance of the udeb definitely lies with the library > maintainer, not the installer team. So it makes perfect sense to me that we > would want the requirements for udebs documented centrally where all > maintainers can refer to them.
No disagreement here. Even better, if udebs were documented in more detail, it would make it easier for package maintainers to deal with day-to-day maintenance without having to talk to the d-i team directly as much. If someone writes a udeb policy, that will be an excellent contribution. Thanks for clarifying, and sorry for the confusion. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
