On 11/01/13 09:44 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 01/11/2013 02:21 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: >> The man page says that it is a suffix. If the doc is wrong, please fix >> the doc to match reality. > > which is well know, several times already discussed (with you too :), > and on the wheezy todo.
I know that in general the man pages are still out of date, but as it is quite relevant to this bug filing, I wanted to bring it up, as it sheds light on why the patch won't be accepted. > so far, (as i've explained) i haven't updated it on *purpose* yet since > the manpages need a complete rewrite to match reality, not just for that > one option, and that means going to the whole code and write the manpage > alongside. > > as you can see, also not even the bootparameter has been updated (since > it's not long ago that the final name has been choosen; > persistence-subtext vs. persistence-label). > > but all that is not the point of the bug.. so, my initial question still > stands. Well, that question makes more sense now in light of my observations above. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
