Thank you for your patch! I haven't had much time to look at it yet, but it seems good from my first look. I'll take a better look at it later.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:39:29PM +0100, lemonsqueeze wrote: > Here is a patch against 1.5-7 that fixes it. Contacted upstream about > it, it is unclear if new versions of the package will be released, so > posting it here. I had the same issue when contacting upstream regarding my tcpprof patch. Are you able to quote us the relevant parts of your conversation with upstream? I ask that only for documentation purposes. I need to further investigate what is the best practice when fixing bugs of a "dead" upstream project. The problem is that each patch I add to the package, we deviate from upstream further and further. It could become a problem for future maintainers if upstream ever releases a new version. > - use setitimer() instead of ualarm(): not limited to 1s (linux) According to setitimer manpage, setitimer is obsolete and timer_settime should be used instead. Debian's libc seems to support timer_settime. Is there a reason not to use timer_settime instead of setitimer? Cheers, Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
