Quoting Mario Izquierdo (mariodeb...@gmail.com):
> El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 08:07 +0100, Christian PERRIER escribió:
> > Quoting Mario Izquierdo (mariodeb...@gmail.com):
> > > Sorry for late response...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I uploaded to mentors:
> > > 
> > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/tcos
> > > 
> > > Could you sign and upload to Debian???
> > 
> > Well, there are more changes than only the one needed to fix #694870.
> > 
> > Unless you have *very very* good reasons and probably a pre-approval
> > by the release team, I'd recommend adding only what's needed to fix
> > the release critical bug.
> > 
> 
> 
> All the changes are needed to build TCOS boot images for Debian unstable
> (and Wheezy)
> 
> http://tcosproject.org/cgit/tcos.git/commit/?id=df9ee84ce07fbcf1a9dcbb720632918e0662f170
> 
>     This detect versions > 1.x of pulseaudio (Debian have now 2.0-6)
> 
> http://tcosproject.org/cgit/tcos.git/commit/?id=8231574b03f85f5fd38c66cc7b5f52a0db3cda11
> 
>     This remove a incorrect divert that cause to not upgrade
>     chroot if udev is updated.
> 
> http://tcosproject.org/cgit/tcos.git/commit/?id=bd77023afadfe96a0c6ab86343b02b695567439f
> 
>     This is a mix of 3 fixes:
> 
>      * Replace "modprobe -l" with a bash function to search module
>      * Fix Multiarch paths for alsa & pulseaudio
>      * Use mesa libGL instead of downloading deb package and use it
> 
> 
> If you don't use any of this patches, TCOS images will not boot, or not
> have sound or use nVidia/ATI libGL when other driver is needed (bad
> performance)
> 
> I can prepare a package with only modprobe fix, but I think I must fix
> all problems for wheezy, we can create 2 another RC bugs to indicate
> this 2 newer changes...



Well, those you need to convince with these arguments, Mario, is the
release team.

I know nearly nothing about this package and therefore can't discuss
whether the fixes you're talking about above areimportant enough to
deserve a freeze exception. It seems so, but I'm not the one who will
unblock the package.

So, my recommendation is:

- if you feel these changes are mandatory enough for wheezy,then
prepare the package with them and prepare a debdiff wrt the package
version currently in wheezy

- then ask for *pre-approval* to the release team:
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org

- there, explain that your fix includes a fix the the RC bug *plus*
fixes you feel are mandatory for wheezy (mandatory means that you
think the package is mostly useless without these changes)

- then wait for their approval.

If they approve, the point one of us to the .dsc and we'll upload

If they only want to get the fix for the RC bug, then prepare a
package with it...and we'll upload too.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to