On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Sandro Tosi wrote: > thanks for your work to make numpy a better package :)
thanks for maintaining this core package ;) > > - one assures that all for loops are secured with set -e, so if any > > command fails, the loop fails (do not remember who pointed me to this > > drawback > > in my packages originally, thanks again ;) ) > that makes sense, applied (in my local checkout, will commit once the > test build has finished). coolio > > - tests failures are not ignored > they are * temporarily* ignored. yeah -- later on Julian hinted me on that ;-) > > imho it is much better to submit packages with only known to fail tests > > disabled/excluded or > > even better resolved > that's currently what's being done, cfr > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/created_by/sandrotosi?page=1&sort=updated&state=open > + closed. cool! > > yes -- currently it would lead to FTBFS since all (or nearly all -- that > > is the point, impossible to figure out besides going through all of them 1 > > by > > 1) architectures show some kind of test failure or a crash: > yes, I know, and as you probably know too, this patch won't be > accepted until all those tests are ironed out. fair enough thanks again -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
