Hello! Ivo De Decker wrote on 2012-12-22 22:35:
> As there is still an RC bug in sid, I don't think it makes sense to do a TPU > upload for the other one now. I'm attaching the TPU fix for 682824 for > reference. As said I will try to update capi4hylafax because of this RC bug. If I can fix this RC in capi4hylafax, then I must move this bug to the capi4hylafax package before upload, right? > It might be best to revert all the changes in unstable (since -1) that are not > suitable for wheezy, and try to get a version in unstable that fixes both RC > bugs in a non-intrusive way (based on -1). That way, the package could be > tested in unstable before it gets to wheezy. The changes that are in -2 could > go to experimental for now. Which is the best way? a) create the updated version 3:6.0.6-5 which is the same as 3:6.0.6-1 and then create the next version 3:6.0.6-6 which all needed patches for Wheezy, or b) create the updated version 4:6.0.6-1 which is the same as 3:6.0.6-1 and then create the next version 4:6.0.6-2 which all needed patches for Wheezy, or c) create a special Wheezy version 3:6.0.6-2+deb7u1 with all needed patches for Wheezy. What is your opinion? I would prefer way c). --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
