On Thu, 27 Dec 2012, Jerry Quinn wrote:

I was bitten by the same bug.  I'm certainly not an *advanced* user of
dovecot.  When I first set up dovecot it worked perfectly for me out of the
box.  I had no idea where to look without seeing the original reporter's
workaround.


and

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:

I experienced the same problem. It is really annoying that a previously
working configuration breaks on a minor package upgrade.


I sympathize, I really do but may I point out that this is now documented
in /usr/share/dovecot-core/NEWS.Debian.gz. It is your responsibility to read changelogs, NEWS.Debian, README.Debian etc to find out what has changed before upgrading. (Though I'm sure I could do a better job of documentation. Feel free to ding me on that.)

This wasn't a minor upgrade. Much work was done to get dovecot working the way it is supposed to. It is only happy coincidence that some things worked in the past; they were not, strictly speaking, features.


The solution I suggest is to have a script that replicates dovecot
mailbox auto detection and writes the relevant configuration entry
during the upgrade process. It should not be too difficult to implement.
I can help with such a script, but I don't know enough ucf to handle the
creation/modification of the configuration file during upgrade.


The other problem I am facing right now is that Debian is in a freeze for the next version and so I can't make drastic changes to the package. In the future I will use ucf. However given the complexity of this software and the wide variety of uses it is put to, there will always be manual configuration involved.

--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to