On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > On Oct 19, 2005, at 4:47 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >Please act on this bug very soon, or I will coordinate with Ubuntu and > >Michael, and upload a cryptsetup-luks package to superseed cryptsetup. > > This is Michael Pitt? Or someone else?
The bug submitter, actually. I've added him to the recipient list. > When a LUKS cryptsetup is uploaded, I would like to see it > replace cryptsetup. There's little point to having both, IMO. Ok. The easiest way is to change what is inside the cryptstup package, then. > Michael Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was going to add LUKS support. > I haven't heard back from him in some time, however, so perhaps > he's not going to do it anymore. I will bug him, and if he doesn't reply soon, I will take over the mission until he shows up again. If you are interested as well, we could coordinate all things dm-crypt thorugh alioth. Do you think that is worthwhile? > Are you using cryptsetup actively? Part of the reason I keep letting > the bug reports accumulate is so I can hit them all at once with a > reasonable amount of testing. I don't run it much anymore, so > unless I sit down to test it, it doesn't get tested. Actually yes, due to the laptop and USB key that really require crypto for the sensivity of the things I carry in them. I use them sporadically, but it is easy enough to move them to everyday use. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
