On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Steffen Vogel wrote: > > > There still the problem that the package name (sun) might be too generic > > to be included in the archive. What do you think about this concern? > > I think sun is the perfect name for this tool and there is no need to change > it.
It is indeed too generic. Better have a not-so-generic name NOW, than problems later. I'd go with sun-cron, or something like that. Even "daylight" (which is likely to also be too generic) would be better than "sun", IMHO... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
