On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:21 +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El domingo, 18 de septiembre de 2005 12:04, David Vilar escribió: > > Ok, that seems to be the problem. /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 pointed > > to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2.seg, a backup copy of libGL.so.1.2 > > from xlibmesa-gl I made when I tried to install the ATI proprietary > > drivers a while ago. I made it point to the file of the current > > xlibmesa-gl and it all works again. What puzzles me is that it was > > xlibmesa-gl the one who made the link to the old file. In order to > > be sure about that I deleted the link and reinstalled xlibmesa-gl. > > After that the link pointed again to the old file. Is this expected > > behaviour? > > Could you please expand "the old file"? Do you mean that it points > to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2.seg instead of the right file?
Yes, ldconfig interprets .seg as a patchlevel, so it considers libGL.so.1.2.seg newer than libGL.so.1.2. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
