On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > The owner of a bug (set by command "owner" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) doesn't > get mail sent to the bug, the same way that the package maintainer > does. This happened to me on bug 325704 . > > This should really happen by default. > > The bug subscription feature means one now has a work-around, but it > should still happen by default.
You mean that you think the owner of a bug should get subscribed to the bug by default? Since you can subscribe to the bug so trivially, I don't see why you wouldn't just send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] at the same time you sent mail to owner if you wanted the mail and weren't already subscribed to the bug. Don Armstrong -- Three little words. (In decending order of importance.) I love you -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/graphics/batch35.php http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
