On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 10:32:33AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 11:23:35AM +0000, Colin Watson a écrit : > > Your call. It's not urgent for wheezy - I just wanted to send the patch > > rather than forgetting about it (which I certainly would do if I didn't > > send it straight away). OTOH I don't think it's in the least bit risky > > for wheezy if you feel like including it along with something else. > > Thanks for the answer. > > I will wait and see the outcome of the current discussion on debian-devel > before taking action. > > https://lists.debian.org/20121206080512.gl4...@p12n.org
Perhaps it's reasonable to improve the defaults (although at first glance this suggestion strikes me as excessively magic and rather fragile - from a package maintainer's point of view rather than that of somebody looking at the whole state of multiarch in Debian, I wouldn't want to rely on it), but I don't see any reason why packages shouldn't be explicit anyway. It would take less time than we've already used between us in this discussion. :-) Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
