On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Darik Horn <dajh...@vanadac.com> wrote: >> 1. Version number of upstream release needs to be mangled to something >> like 0.6.0~rc12, because 0.6.0-rc12 is larger than 0.6.0, and 0.6.0.xx >> isn't that easy to identify for users. >> >> 2. Recommend to clear d/changelog for uploading to Debian, it's a new start, >> :-) > > I asked upstream about this concern earlier. The current plan is to > release the first non-RC as version 0.6.1 and use git-buildpackage > versioning afterwards. (ie: There will be no official 0.6.0 release, > only release candidates.) > > I intend to clear the changelog when I branch for wheezy and raring, > and then use separate branches thereafter. >
Good to know! > >> 3. Use compat 9 and Build-Depends on debhelper >= 9, this makes your >> binaries in usr/sbin being hardened at build-time. >> >> 4. Architecture should be linux-any, as they are only intended for Linux. >> >> 5. Revise descriptions in d/control based on Carlos's current draft in ITP. >> >> 6. Update Standards-Version to 3.9.4 >> >> 7. spl-dkms.postinst spl-dkms.prerm should be removed because they are >> not actually used. >> >> 8. Add a dedicate paragraph in d/copyright for GPL-2+. > > Okay, done. See: > https://github.com/dajhorn/pkg-spl/commit/e07989f936096ef82b7807f904caed26c02a864a > Thanks, and I see there is a .pc directory in your git repository, which is not necessary, quilt/dpkg-source will re-create it whenever they process the patches. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
