Hi Adam,

as promised I uploaded another attempt to fix the problem.  A debdiff
against the current version in testing is attached to this mail.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:23:53PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 23:23 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Please unblock package axis
> > 
> > Thanks to Alberto Fernández Martínez <inf...@gmail.com>
> > CVE-2012-5784 (=bug #692650) was fixed and I just sponsered
> > his NMU.  Debdiff is attached.
> 
> It appears that this isn't quite ready yet. Please get back to us (and
> remove the moreinfo tag) once a final package is in unstable.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Adam
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de
diff -Nru axis-1.4/debian/changelog axis-1.4/debian/changelog
--- axis-1.4/debian/changelog   2011-11-08 05:58:09.000000000 +0100
+++ axis-1.4/debian/changelog   2012-12-06 14:41:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+axis (1.4-16.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix CVE-2012-5784 (Closes: #692650)
+  * Fix CN extraction from DN of X500 principal.
+  * Fix wildcard validation on ssl connections
+
+ -- Alberto Fernández Martínez <inf...@gmail.com>  Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:28:00 
+0100
+
+axis (1.4-16.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix CVE-2012-5784 (Closes: #692650)
+
+ -- Alberto Fernández Martínez <inf...@gmail.com>  Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:28:00 
+0100
+
 axis (1.4-16) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add missing dependency on libcommons-httpclient-java
diff -Nru axis-1.4/debian/patches/06-fix-CVE-2012-5784.patch 
axis-1.4/debian/patches/06-fix-CVE-2012-5784.patch
--- axis-1.4/debian/patches/06-fix-CVE-2012-5784.patch  1970-01-01 
01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ axis-1.4/debian/patches/06-fix-CVE-2012-5784.patch  2012-12-06 
13:45:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
+Description: Fixed CN extraction from DN of X500 principal and wildcard 
validation
+
+ axis (1.4-16.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+   * Fixed CN extraction from DN of X500 principal and wildcard validation
+
+Author: Alberto Fernández Martínez <inf...@gmail.com>
+
+
+Origin: other
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/692650
+Forwarded: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2883
+Last-Update: <2012-12-06>
+
+--- axis-1.4.orig/src/org/apache/axis/components/net/JSSESocketFactory.java
++++ axis-1.4/src/org/apache/axis/components/net/JSSESocketFactory.java
+@@ -15,12 +15,6 @@
+  */
+ package org.apache.axis.components.net;
+ 
+-import org.apache.axis.utils.Messages;
+-import org.apache.axis.utils.XMLUtils;
+-import org.apache.axis.utils.StringUtils;
+-
+-import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocket;
+-import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory;
+ import java.io.BufferedWriter;
+ import java.io.IOException;
+ import java.io.InputStream;
+@@ -28,7 +22,27 @@ import java.io.OutputStream;
+ import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
+ import java.io.PrintWriter;
+ import java.net.Socket;
++import java.security.cert.Certificate;
++import java.security.cert.CertificateParsingException;
++import java.security.cert.X509Certificate;
++import java.util.Arrays;
++import java.util.Collection;
+ import java.util.Hashtable;
++import java.util.Iterator;
++import java.util.LinkedList;
++import java.util.List;
++import java.util.Locale;
++import java.util.StringTokenizer;
++import java.util.regex.Pattern;
++
++import javax.net.ssl.SSLException;
++import javax.net.ssl.SSLSession;
++import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocket;
++import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory;
++
++import org.apache.axis.utils.Messages;
++import org.apache.axis.utils.StringUtils;
++import org.apache.axis.utils.XMLUtils;
+ 
+ 
+ /**
+@@ -41,6 +55,10 @@ import java.util.Hashtable;
+  */
+ public class JSSESocketFactory extends DefaultSocketFactory implements 
SecureSocketFactory {
+ 
++    // This is a a sorted list, if you insert new elements do it orderdered.
++    private final static String[] BAD_COUNTRY_2LDS =
++        {"ac", "co", "com", "ed", "edu", "go", "gouv", "gov", "info",
++            "lg", "ne", "net", "or", "org"};
+     /** Field sslFactory           */
+     protected SSLSocketFactory sslFactory = null;
+ 
+@@ -187,6 +205,260 @@ public class JSSESocketFactory extends D
+         if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
+             log.debug(Messages.getMessage("createdSSL00"));
+         }
++        verifyHostName(host, (SSLSocket) sslSocket);
+         return sslSocket;
+     }
++    /**
++     * Verifies that the given hostname in certicifate is the hostname we are 
trying to connect to
++     * http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2012-5783/
++     * @param host
++     * @param ssl
++     * @throws IOException
++     */
++    
++      private static void verifyHostName(String host, SSLSocket ssl)
++                      throws IOException {
++              if (host == null) {
++                      throw new IllegalArgumentException("host to verify was 
null");
++              }
++
++              SSLSession session = ssl.getSession();
++              if (session == null) {
++            // In our experience this only happens under IBM 1.4.x when
++            // spurious (unrelated) certificates show up in the server's 
chain.
++            // Hopefully this will unearth the real problem:
++                      InputStream in = ssl.getInputStream();
++                      in.available();
++            /*
++                 If you're looking at the 2 lines of code above because you're
++                 running into a problem, you probably have two options:
++
++                    #1.  Clean up the certificate chain that your server
++                         is presenting (e.g. edit "/etc/apache2/server.crt" or
++                         wherever it is your server's certificate chain is
++                         defined).
++
++                                             OR
++
++                    #2.   Upgrade to an IBM 1.5.x or greater JVM, or switch 
to a
++                          non-IBM JVM.
++              */
++
++            // If ssl.getInputStream().available() didn't cause an exception,
++            // maybe at least now the session is available?
++                      session = ssl.getSession();
++                      if (session == null) {
++                // If it's still null, probably a startHandshake() will
++                // unearth the real problem.
++                              ssl.startHandshake();
++
++                // Okay, if we still haven't managed to cause an exception,
++                // might as well go for the NPE.  Or maybe we're okay now?
++                              session = ssl.getSession();
++                      }
++              }
++
++              Certificate[] certs = session.getPeerCertificates();
++              verifyHostName(host.trim().toLowerCase(Locale.US),  
(X509Certificate) certs[0]);
++      }
++      /**
++       * Extract the names from the certificate and tests host matches one of 
them
++       * @param host
++       * @param cert
++       * @throws SSLException
++       */
++
++      private static void verifyHostName(final String host, X509Certificate 
cert)
++                      throws SSLException {
++        // I'm okay with being case-insensitive when comparing the host we 
used
++        // to establish the socket to the hostname in the certificate.
++        // Don't trim the CN, though.
++        
++              String cn = getCN(cert);
++              String[] subjectAlts = getDNSSubjectAlts(cert);
++              verifyHostName(host, cn.toLowerCase(Locale.US), subjectAlts);
++
++      }
++
++      /**
++       * Extract all alternative names from a certificate.
++       * @param cert
++       * @return
++       */
++      private static String[] getDNSSubjectAlts(X509Certificate cert) {
++              LinkedList subjectAltList = new LinkedList();
++              Collection c = null;
++              try {
++                      c = cert.getSubjectAlternativeNames();
++              } catch (CertificateParsingException cpe) {
++                      // Should probably log.debug() this?
++                      cpe.printStackTrace();
++              }
++              if (c != null) {
++                      Iterator it = c.iterator();
++                      while (it.hasNext()) {
++                              List list = (List) it.next();
++                              int type = ((Integer) list.get(0)).intValue();
++                              // If type is 2, then we've got a dNSName
++                              if (type == 2) {
++                                      String s = (String) list.get(1);
++                                      subjectAltList.add(s);
++                              }
++                      }
++              }
++              if (!subjectAltList.isEmpty()) {
++                      String[] subjectAlts = new 
String[subjectAltList.size()];
++                      subjectAltList.toArray(subjectAlts);
++                      return subjectAlts;
++              } else {
++                      return new String[0];
++              }
++              
++      }
++      /**
++       * Verifies
++       * @param host
++       * @param cn
++       * @param subjectAlts
++       * @throws SSLException
++       */
++
++      private static void verifyHostName(final String host, String cn, 
String[] subjectAlts)throws SSLException{
++              StringBuffer cnTested = new StringBuffer();
++
++              for (int i = 0; i < subjectAlts.length; i++){
++                      String name = subjectAlts[i];
++                      if (name != null) {
++                              name = name.toLowerCase(Locale.US);
++                              if (verifyHostName(host, name)){
++                                      return;
++                              }
++                              cnTested.append("/").append(name);
++                      }                               
++              }
++              if (cn != null && verifyHostName(host, cn)){
++                      return;
++              }
++              cnTested.append("/").append(cn);
++              throw new SSLException("hostname in certificate didn't match: <"
++                                      + host + "> != <" + cnTested + ">");
++              
++      }               
++      
++      private static boolean verifyHostName(final String host, final String 
cn){
++              if (doWildCard(cn) && !isIPAddress(host)) {
++                      return matchesWildCard(cn, host);
++              } 
++              return host.equalsIgnoreCase(cn);
++      }
++    private static boolean doWildCard(String cn) {
++              // Contains a wildcard
++              // wildcard in the first block
++      // not an ipaddress (ip addres must explicitily be equal)
++      // not using 2nd level common tld : ex: not for *.co.uk
++      String parts[] = cn.split("\\.");
++      return parts.length >= 3 &&
++                      parts[0].endsWith("*") &&
++                      acceptableCountryWildcard(cn) &&
++                      !isIPAddress(cn);
++    }
++
++      private static final Pattern IPV4_PATTERN =
++                      
Pattern.compile("^(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\\d|[0-1]?\\d?\\d)(\\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\\d|[0-1]?\\d?\\d)){3}$");
++
++      private static final Pattern IPV6_STD_PATTERN = 
++                      
Pattern.compile("^(?:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){7}[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}$");
++
++      private static final Pattern IPV6_HEX_COMPRESSED_PATTERN = 
++                      
Pattern.compile("^((?:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}(?::[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4})*)?)::((?:[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4}(?::[0-9A-Fa-f]{1,4})*)?)$");
++
++
++      private static boolean isIPAddress(final String hostname) {
++              return hostname != null
++                              && (
++                                              
IPV4_PATTERN.matcher(hostname).matches()
++                                              || 
IPV6_STD_PATTERN.matcher(hostname).matches() 
++                                              || 
IPV6_HEX_COMPRESSED_PATTERN.matcher(hostname).matches()
++              );
++
++      }
++
++      private static boolean acceptableCountryWildcard(final String cn) {
++              // The CN better have at least two dots if it wants wildcard 
action,
++              // but can't be [*.co.uk] or [*.co.jp] or [*.org.uk], etc...
++              // The [*.co.uk] problem is an interesting one. Should we just
++              // hope that CA's would never foolishly allow such a
++              // certificate to happen?
++      
++              String[] parts = cn.split("\\.");
++              // Only checks for 3 levels, with country code of 2 letters.
++              if (parts.length > 3 || parts[parts.length - 1].length() != 2) {
++                      return true;
++              }
++              String countryCode = parts[parts.length - 2];
++              return Arrays.binarySearch(BAD_COUNTRY_2LDS, countryCode) < 0;
++      }
++
++      private static boolean matchesWildCard(final String cn,
++                      final String hostName) {
++              String parts[] = cn.split("\\.");
++              boolean match = false;
++              String firstpart = parts[0];
++              if (firstpart.length() > 1) {
++                      // server∗
++                      // e.g. server
++                      String prefix =  firstpart.substring(0, 
firstpart.length() - 1);
++                      // skipwildcard part from cn
++                      String suffix = cn.substring(firstpart.length()); 
++                      // skip wildcard part from host
++                      String hostSuffix = 
hostName.substring(prefix.length());                        
++                      match = hostName.startsWith(prefix) && 
hostSuffix.endsWith(suffix);
++              } else {
++                      match = hostName.endsWith(cn.substring(1));
++              }
++              if (match) {
++                      // I f we ’ r e i n s t r i c t mode ,
++                      // [ ∗.foo.com] is not allowed to match [a.b.foo.com]
++                      match = countDots(hostName) == countDots(cn);
++              }
++              return match;
++      }
++
++      private static int countDots(final String data) {
++              int dots = 0;
++              for (int i = 0; i < data.length(); i++) {
++                      if (data.charAt(i) == '.') {
++                              dots += 1;
++                      }
++              }
++              return dots;
++      }
++
++
++      private static String getCN(X509Certificate cert) {
++          // Note:  toString() seems to do a better job than getName()
++          //
++          // For example, getName() gives me this:
++          // 
1.2.840.113549.1.9.1=#16166a756c6975736461766965734063756362632e636f6d
++          //
++          // whereas toString() gives me this:
++          // EMAILADDRESS=juliusdav...@cucbc.com        
++              String subjectPrincipal = 
cert.getSubjectX500Principal().toString();
++              
++              return getCN(subjectPrincipal);
++
++      }
++      private static String getCN(String subjectPrincipal) {
++              StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(subjectPrincipal, ",");
++              while(st.hasMoreTokens()) {
++                      String tok = st.nextToken().trim();
++                      if (tok.length() > 3) {
++                              if (tok.substring(0, 
3).equalsIgnoreCase("CN=")) {
++                                      return tok.substring(3);
++                              }
++                      }
++              }
++              return null;
++      }
++
+ }
diff -Nru axis-1.4/debian/patches/series axis-1.4/debian/patches/series
--- axis-1.4/debian/patches/series      2011-10-27 21:52:50.000000000 +0200
+++ axis-1.4/debian/patches/series      2012-12-05 17:50:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
 axis-bz152255.patch
 javadoc.diff
 add-osgi-metadata.patch
+06-fix-CVE-2012-5784.patch

Reply via email to