Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 00:35 +0100, Laurent Bigonville a écrit : > const PASSWORD_SERVICE_NAME = 'gdm-password'; > > Changing this to "gdm3" fix this issue.
You might want to search for other instances of this string. I find it flabbergasting that the PAM service is used in the UI rather than only in the slave, but upstream works in mysterious ways… > I'm wondering, why is gdm using different pam service name > (gdm3 vs gdm-password) as the one that upstream is using? The gdm(2) > package is using "gdm" as pam service name. Historical reasons: file conflict with the gdm (2.x) package, then quick-fixes to the spaghetti introduced by multi-stack (which I still don’t see how we can usefully integrate in Debian). -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
