Package: lfm Version: 2.2-1 Severity: important Hi,
I have discovered that it is preferable not to use 'move' of lfm it is dangerous since it does copy the data differently than any linux mv function. lfm leaves chances for desaster of some data is the networking is failing when one copy over samba or nfs. It is highly recommended that lfm uses 'mv' for moving directories. Example: lfm move dvd01 /samba move dvd02 /samba with lfm it will takes ages, and it will copy bit per bits. with mv (utils of bin of linux), it will take 2sec since it simply tell linux to change the dir position. I hope it helped sincerely -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lfm depends on: ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-support 1.0.10 automated rebuilding support for P lfm recommends no packages. lfm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
