On 2012-12-02 21:37, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
>> to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
>> the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades.
>>
>> There are also some (partial) upgrade issues with the 32-bit stuff on amd64
>
> Could you implement those fixes as a minimal tpu?
I don't see any non-documentation change that would be worth stripping
out from -2/-3 without reintroducing some bug.
Perhaps the Built-Using addition, but that only affects the fglrx-source
package which will only be used by a minority of the fglrx users. And
the same code is used in the nvidia packages in wheezy as well.
Andreas
PS: I just noticed filterdiff --exclude *.po* also excluded this chunk:
--- debian/fglrx-driver.postrm (.../12-6+point-1) (revision 1132)
+++ debian/fglrx-driver.postrm (.../1:12-6+point-3) (revision 1132)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
warn_about_remaining_xorg_configuration()
{
# allow to disable the check via preseeding
- db_get fglrx-driver/check-xorg-conf-on-removal
+ db_get fglrx-driver/check-xorg-conf-on-removal || true
test "$RET" = "true" || return 0
XORG_CONF=$(grep -l '^[^#]*fglrx' /etc/X11/xorg.conf
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*.conf 2>/dev/null || true)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
