Hello, Thank you for your quick comment!
>>> In Message "Re: Bug#694124: unblock: jless/382-iso262-2.1" >>> <50b08e5d.1000...@thykier.net>, >>> Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> said; > > Here is a fix for serious bugs (#684633, #680632 and #433086) > > with minimal changes. > > > They all appear to be important and normal (versus serious)? Anyhow, > that is still enough for an unblock via sid. Oh, I consider this bug is serious for RC. So I changed severity. After this unblock request. > > unblock jless/382-iso262-2.1 > > > > [...] > Looks fine, feel free to go ahead. Please reply back to this bug once > the fixed version has been in sid for a couple of dates (and it has been > rebuilt successfully on all relevant architectures). And I'm sorry. I mistook on the version of this request. I already retitled the bug to jless/382-iso262-3 by control request. Is it OK for upload to unstable by retitling? Or do I need re-send new unblock request with proper version? Regards, -- Tatsuki Sugiura mailto:s...@nemui.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
