Norbert Preining wrote:

>> Thanks for this hint.  Looks like the missing dependency is on an
>> updated version of texlive-base.
>
> ok, right, probably I forgot to update that one.
>
>> At first glance, a Depends seems likely to make the most sense, except
>> that it would make a circular dependency.  
>
> It will be a dependency on texlive-common which forces everything
> else Ihope (due to conflicts).

Neat.  Yeah, a versioned depends from texlive-binaries on
texlive-common should do just fine.

Thanks for the quick feedback and upgrade help. :)  Updating
texlive-base by hand and trying the upgrade again worked fine here,
for what it's worth.

Good night,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to